Define the work
Record the operation or site, people, equipment, geometry and intended review outcome.
UK-first professional beta
Plan the mission. Prove what was checked.
Terrain-aware planning, source provenance and human review in one evidence workspace for flight operations and camera design.
Planning acceleration, not regulatory approval. Every output requires source checks, field confirmation and competent-person review.
01 Flight planning02 Camera design03 Reviewable evidence
01 / Product proof
From the field to a reviewable route result.
See how terrain relief and changing visibility confidence shape a route before the analysis becomes a draft for human review.
Flight terrain proof
A route that shows where visibility confidence changes.
Terrain relief and changing route confidence remain visible in one professional planning view.
Evidence lifecycle
From first input to reviewed draft, the process stays visible.
Inspect the sources
See grade, coverage, resolution, datum, age, licence and failure state before analysis.
Analyse and resolve
Run a frozen scene, inspect blocked and unknown areas, then record human controls.
Review the evidence
Prepare a traceable draft pack for competent-person review. SighThor does not grant approval.
02 / Two workspaces
One evidence foundation. Two professional workflows.
Flight and Camera have different buyers, standards and decisions. SighThor keeps their journeys separate while sharing scene, terrain and provenance foundations.
Flight Operations
Route visibility with the gaps left visible.
Build a UK-first mission draft around terrain, surface evidence, observers, altitude, airspace context and explicit unresolved checks.
Camera Design
Coverage geometry that respects the scene.
Place cameras, separate sensor-derived and manual optics, inspect terrain and obstruction effects, and prepare a reviewable schedule.
03 / Inspectable proof
See how the real site shapes camera coverage.
Buildings, perimeter geometry and vegetation remain visible where they reduce, overlap or interrupt the nominal coverage model.
Camera coverage proof
Coverage shaped by the actual site, not a flat plan.
Buildings, perimeter geometry and vegetation visibly affect the model before a design is handed to a practitioner.
04 / Method
Source details travel with the result.
SighThor is designed so a reviewer can inspect what was selected, what failed, which calculation version ran and what still needs a human decision.
Data health before analysis
Publisher, coverage, grade, datum, resolution, age, licence, health and NoData remain explicit.
Frozen scene and result
Geometry, sources, assumptions, engine version and result are linked by deterministic evidence hashes.
Human-reviewed draft pack
Review, signature, submission and an uploaded authority decision remain distinct lifecycle events.
Portfolio case study
Built for the people who must explain the plan.
See how SighThor supports drone operators, camera installers, security consultants and site teams with terrain-aware simulation, explicit uncertainty and reviewable evidence.